Le Canada pas assez de couilles !

Oui les américains se mettent en mode protectionniste, mais ils ont raison.

Le problème à la base, c'est que l'on n'attaque pas le problème de fond.

On sait que les pays émergents font du dumping social, particulièrement la Chine qui maintient sa monnaie sous-évaluée en créant une fausse compétitivité.

Comme le G20 est un gros G0, car ils s’entendent sur rien, la mondialisation est une simple fumisterie.

Et comme le congrès est contrôlé par les financiers et les gros industriels américains qui profitent de la mondialisation en évitant des sanctions contre la Chine.

Alors, l'arme indirecte des Américains est de se mettre en mode protectionniste.

Et comme le Canada joue à la pute en faisant des yeux doux avec les pays émergents, en ne supportant pas les Américains face à leurs revendications, ils subissent les dommages collatéraux, en oubliant que notre principal client de proximité est les États-Unis.

Les Américains ont plus de support provenant du Brésil, que son voisin du Nord, qui n’a pas assez de couilles, pour garder une bonne relation.

Honnêtement, si j’étais américain, je ferais exactement la même chose, ils ont le bassin de population et l’industrialisation pour prôner le protectionniste.

Je vous invite à lire le dernier article, à quel point que les Américains sont écœurés de la délocalisation.

Peut-être les politiciens américains couchent avec les oligarques, mais ne prenez pas le peuple américain pour des imbéciles.


Extrait de : Non à la clause "Buy American", La presse canadienne, les affaires.com, 14-09-2011

Ottawa promet de lutter contre la volonté des États-Unis d'inclure des dispositions "Buy American" dans leur nouveau programme de création d'emplois, d'une valeur de quelques centaines de milliards de dollars.

Le ministre du Commerce international, Ed Fast, s'est plaint mercredi des mesures américaines, visant notamment à empêcher les fournisseurs canadiens de prendre part à des appels d'offres dans le cadre de projets publics de construction.

"Notre gouvernement est déterminé à jouer un rôle de leader par rapport au libre-échange, et les Canadiens peuvent compter sur lui pour défendre le maintien d'échanges libres et ouverts sur le marché international", a affirmé M. Fast par voie de communiqué.

"J'ai demandé aux fonctionnaires canadiens d'entamer le processus de consultation prévu dans l'Accord de 2010 sur les marchés publics entre le Canada et les États-Unis", a-t-il ajout

Le Congrès des États-Unis avait déjà adopté, en 2009, un programme de relance de l'économie qui cherchait également à favoriser les entreprises américaines au détriment de leurs concurrentes étrangères. Ottawa avait cependant fini par obtenir une exemption pour le Canada.

Il est cependant possible que cela soit arrivé trop tard pour de nombreux fournisseurs canadiens.

L'organisme Manufacturiers et Exportateurs du Canada (MEC) estime en effet que les compagnies du nord de la frontière ont perdu des milliards de dollars lors de l'octroi de contrats relativement aux projets d'infrastructures aux États-Unis.

Les fournisseurs d'acier, de conduites d'égout, de métaux, de tuyaux et d'autres matériaux de construction ont été affectés par la situation.

Les mesures américaines ont rendu la Fédération canadienne des municipalités (FCM) furieuse à un point tel qu'elle a adopté une résolution afin que les fournisseurs américains soient à leur tour victimes de discrimination, à moins qu'une solution soit trouvée au problème.

L'annonce du projet de loi de 447 milliards $ US, dont les détails ont été dévoilés mardi par le président Barack Obama, semble faire abstraction du compromis atteint l'an dernier par les deux gouvernements.

Le programme américain de relance de l'emploi contient des mesures protectionnistes semblables à celles prévues dans le plan de 2009. La partie la plus préoccupante pour les entreprises canadiennes est la Section 4, qui stipule que les fonds obtenus dans le cadre de l'American Jobs Act ne peuvent servir à acquérir que du fer, de l'acier et des produits manufacturiers fabriqués aux États-Unis.

Le ministre Fast a estimé que le protectionnisme était une pratique contre-productive.

Alors, cher ministre, quand vous maintenez une monnaie volontairement sous-évaluée, vous appelez cela comment ?

Un protectionniste camouflé pour se protéger de la concurrence.

Après on se demande pourquoi l’économie mondiale va si mal !

"En cette période de reprise économique fragile, nous rappelons que l'histoire a montré que les mesures protectionnistes freinent la croissance et tuent les emplois", a-t-il affirmé.

"Notre gouvernement soulèvera auprès de l'administration Obama et du Congrès américain ses préoccupations concernant les mesures qui entravent l'accès des entreprises et des travailleurs canadiens au marché américain, comme nous l'avons fait auparavant en réponse aux programmes de relance américains", a ajouté le ministre.


Any Jobs Bill Must Have Buy American and Hire America Mandatory Requirements

Paul Krugman shows the 2009 economic stimulus was not enough. We've shown as have many others, tax cuts for the rich do not create jobs. Yet, many criticized the $787 Billion Stimulus bill as spending, loaded with political favors and misdirected funds. For example, 84% of the green jobs went offshore and build America bonds were yet another gift for Goldman Sachs.

The problem with the original stimulus wasn't that it wasn't big enough. It was not smart enough. What we need is true domestic stimulus. If you're going to spend our money to stimulate our economy, stop shipping our dough to China instead.

Is this possible? Can one stop the offshore outsourcing of jobs, especially jobs created with our hard earned taxpayer dollars? Is there anything that can be done which actually goes to American workers? Why yes there is. First and foremost, all stimulus funding should have two mandatory requirements, Buy American and Hire America. If a government is enacting Keynesian economic stimulus, they must keep that spending within the domestic economy they wish to stimulate. The last thing America's workers need is stimulating China's economy and generating more jobs for them.

We know, in aggregate at least, multinational corporations hired offshore while firing in the United States. We also know outsourcing is not good for America on a macro economic scale.

We also know there has been no job growth since 1990 in any occupational category that can be offshore outsourced.

So, instead of austerity versus spending, how about some large economic structural changes? For example, we know the China trade deficit has a lot to do with their currency manipulation. We know NAFTA style trade agreements have cost millions of jobs. We know that multinational corporations move jobs, plants, manufacturing offshore.

Why not address the real problems instead of this never ending banter which does not? After all, it's only America on the line at this point.

It's all well and good to propose WPA, and copy the New Deal era CCC. Considering the 25.2% unemployment rate for teens, a CCC sounds like an outstanding idea. Yet when there are 8 million illegal workers taking jobs that could be done by America's teens, and Democrats refuse to enact and enforce requirements of U.S. citizenship, for Stimulus jobs, what's the point? Yet another jobs program for Mexico's worker overflow?

Infrastructure jobs are great. They are an investment in America's future, needed for America's safety, to improve business conditions, and will provide much needed jobs. But they do nothing when infrastructure projects are handed to Chinese companies:

First, in February, ABC News reported that almost every Americana-themed trinket sold in the Smithsonian Institute is made in China. Then news hit that San Francisco is importing its new Bay Bridge from China. Then came the New York Times dispatch about the Big Apple awarding Chinese state-subsidized firms huge taxpayer-funded contracts to "renovate the subway system, refurbish the Alexander Hamilton Bridge over the Harlem River and build a new Metro-North train platform near Yankee Stadium."

Astounding as all of that is, it was quickly topped by news last week reminding us that the new Martin Luther King monument in Washington was designed by a Chinese government sculptor and assembled by low-wage Chinese workers.

Further, since consumers are 70% of GDP, all eyes look to the U.S. middle class as consumers, even when talking about income inequality. That's a fundamental problem. There needs to be a shift to look at America's middle class as producers, not just some hapless group of credit card crazed shoppers.

How about a recall of all CEOs who ship jobs offshore? The AAM has a great idea. Why not at least kick these Benedict Arnolds out of the White House.

How about a domestic tax on any corporation who offshore outsourced and a tax credit for any business who brings back jobs which were offshore outsourced previously? After all, that is the original point of the corporate tax code, to use incentives to generate economic good behavior in the national interest, not to enable more tax havens and double dutch loopholes.

Ever hear these ideas presented by D.C. political leadership? Of course not, their corporate donors won't let them.

Projected effects of stimulus are represented as GDP multipliers. One needs a multiplier greater than 1 for that act to be effective in comparison to doing nothing. A multiplier is how much more economic output will occur for every $1 of additional spending.

For example, U.S. manufacturing has a strong multiplier effect:

Every dollar in final sales of manufactured products supports $1.40 in output from other sectors of the economy. Manufacturing has the largest multiplier of all sectors, with only information; agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting; and construction coming close. The wholesale and retail trade sectors have the lowest multipliers. Wholesale and retail trade sectors generate only 55 cents and 58 cents,

The Buy American requirement is estimated to increase jobs in U.S. manufacturing by 33%. Just a 1% increase by Americans to buy goods made in America results in 200,000 new jobs.

Of the CBO multiplier estimates, the two strongest are government purchases and infrastructure spending. That said, government purchase, infrastructure GDP multipliers have wide variance, from 1 to 2.5. May we suggest it is only by buy American, or domestically produced goods, that one can get an economic output multiplier on the higher side.

One might notice the insanity of Democrats versus Republicans on hiring U.S. citizens, preferred, and permanent residents. Democrats rail against offshore outsourcing, while the 2009 Stimulus was littered with loopholes to ship jobs overseas. Republicans decry illegal workers, all the way enabling more foreign guest workers in order to fire Americans and take their jobs. Literally Obama is trying to import foreigner workers to displace American professional and technical workers, all under the guise of a manufacturing program. Global labor arbitrage is worker displacement, whether that replacement worker is sitting in Wyoming or Bangalore India is unskilled labor or skilled.

Bottom line, a labor market is supposed to be a domestic labor market and Americans need those jobs. Does it make sense to use America's taxpayer money, money straight from their pockets, to create jobs.....for peoples of other nations? In terms of economic stimulus and multipliers, with an official 9.1% unemployment rate, and some estimates of over 29 million Americans out of work, desperate for a job, no, it does not.

Mandatory Hire America and Buy American requiements will be attacked from special interest groups with a vengeance. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, per their offshore outsourcing multinational corporate agenda, with scream that's protectionist. The left will declare, that's racist, to not create jobs for undocumented immigrants. The right will shout that's anti-business, for curtailing offshore outsourcing and the so called cheaper supply chain. At this point, can America afford more policy that doesn't add up, doesn't make any economic sense that even someone with a 2nd grade education can figure out?

America cannot afford some things, it's true, and the number one thing the United States cannot afford is our corrupt political system landscape and unbelievable lies on what does what to the U.S. economy. We simply must end economic creationism, lobbyist white paper spin and policy agendas declared to do the opposite of their real intent.

We need mandatory hire America and buy American in any bill.


Source: Any Jobs Bill Must Have Buy American and Hire America Mandatory Requirements,
Submitted by Robert Oak, 09/06/2011


 

  1. gravatar

    # by Anonyme - 3 septembre 2014 01:48

    Hey! Someone in my Facebook group shared this site with us
    so I came to check it out. I'm definitely loving the information. I'm bookmarking and will be tweeting this to my followers!
    Great blog and brilliant design.

    Here is my web blog auto body repair sacramento