Canada back is a lack of political creativity
Posted by Québec de Droite in Compétitivité, Taux et Devises on samedi 21 avril 2012
Cahier spécial : A policy vision to escape the race to the bottom
Conclusion
We completely reject the common assumption that it is impossible to sustain a viable, profitable, dynamic auto manufacturing industry in a high-wage economy.
The experience of other industrialized jurisdictions, where automotive manufacturing is a continuing source of growth and prosperity (rather than job loss and displacement), provides ample justification for our faith.
The key difference between Canada and jurisdictions like Germany, Korea, Japan, and even the U.S. is not labour costs (which are high in all of these countries).
Willingness by policymakers to play an active role.
The key difference is a willingness by policymakers to play an active, guiding role in building an industry, and constructing an international advantage.
In Canada, in contrast, policy has relied too much on the assumption that private market forces will automatically create a valuable, appropriate role for us in global economic affairs – and hence government can do no better than to get out of the way.
If we continue to follow that course, our future is clear: Canada will increasingly specialize in the extraction and export of raw natural resources (especially bitumen).
That business will generate certain economic benefits, of course, but cannot provide the foundation for sustained, shared, regionally and sectorally balanced prosperity.
For that Canada needs a different approach
The policy vision described in this paper would mark a significant change in philosophy and direction on the part of our governments. It would move us closer to the perspectives and practices of most other successful auto-producing jurisdictions (and away from the laissez faire assumptions that have dominated policy in most of the Anglo-Saxon world, including Canada, for a generation).
But our proposals, while innovative in the Canadian context, are neither utopian nor untried.
In our judgment, the only thing holding Canada back is a lack of political creativity – the creativity we need to rethink our policy framework, and rebuild a viable new auto industry that can provide good jobs for another generation of Canadians.
Tables des matières
1. A policy vision to escape the race to the bottom
Summary :
Global pressures on the industry are more severe all the time
Impacts of a Canadian dollar
we must adopt a new approach
2. Decline in auto manufacturing employment in Canada
To Hell and Back – Canada’s Auto Industry After the Crisis
Industrialized countries experienced a decline
Preventing plant closures
Government intervention
3. Automotive trade deficit reached an all-time record of $15.6 billion
Auto Industry - Free Trade
Canada-U.S. Auto Pact
World Trade Organization
Trade Balance
Mexico
CANADIAN Petro-Dollar
Race to the bottom
Donc, à qui profite la mondialisation ?
Les gagnants
6. Productivity, Investment and Technology
Productivity, Investment and Technology
Productivity
Investment and Technology
7. Center of gravity is clearly shifting south
Re-thinking Canada’s : A New Policy Vision
And it won’t stop there
We do not accept this grim scenario as natural, efficient, or inevitable.
8. Free trade theories failures
Re-think Trade Policy
With every other trading partner
Optimistic predictions of the free trade theories failures
Canadian trade negotiators have a responsibility
9. The Bank’s power to bring down the dollar is unquestioned
Intervene to Reduce the Canadian Dollar Exchange Rate (1)
Canadian dollar r far above value
Theory freely floating exchange failures
Bank of Canada interventions.
10. Restrict foreign resource takeovers
Intervene to Reduce the Canadian Dollar Exchange Rate (2)
Slowing down resource developments (especially in the oil sands)
Preventing foreign takeovers of Canadian resource assets
11. Canada back is a lack of political creativity
Conclusion
Willingness by policymakers to play an active role.
This entry was posted on samedi 21 avril 2012 at 09:18 and is filed under Compétitivité, Taux et Devises. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response.
Publier un commentaire