US: 20 percent paid 88 percent of income taxes, Canada: 66,8 %

Deux articles qui ont le même objectif qui paie réellement les impôts.

J’ai voulu comparer avec les Américains, si l’on était dans même situation, nous sommes légèrement moins agressif sur les 20 %.

·         Au Canada, 20 % de la population paie 66.8 % les impôts.

·         États-Unis: 20 % de la population paie 88 % les impôts.

Évidemment, tous ceux qui veulent avoir tous gratuit, ne sont pas nécessairement ceux qui paient les impôts, d’autant plus ils ont la majorité ayant plus de 60  % de l’électorat.

Notre démocratie représentative a de plus en plus une saveur de socialisme, enfin !

Il n'y a pas lieu de désespérer parce que comme l'a dit Margaret Thatcher :

"Le socialisme ne dure que jusqu'à ce que se termine l'argent des autres"


Extrait de: William Watson: Forget income inequality. What about income-tax-paying inequality?, William Watson, Financial Post, April 29, 2015

One-fifth of Canadians pay one-half to two-thirds of all income taxes

As the days click down to the new May 5 deadline for this year’s income-tax filings, a grateful nation stands as one and thanks the hardy band of its citizens who do the heaviest lifting at tax time, the top fifth of the population, which fords the extra stream, climbs the extra mountain, follows the extra rainbow, writes the extra zeroes on its tax cheques, and, well, you get the idea.

Actually, the nation, whether grateful or not, does nothing of the sort. It cashes the cheques as fast as it can and spends the money in the blink of a wink, whether on senators’ expense allowances, new Order of Canada websites, or TV ads for the ruling party, as well as on one or two other things that may actually be worthwhile, and then sets its collective mind to how it can get even more money from the faithful fifth next year.

But your loyal correspondent is more than willing to offer a round of appreciation and praise for the much maligned, denigrated and neglected 20 per cent. You know who you are. Nobody else is going to thank you. Take a minute as you try to get your breathing back to normal after the sticker shock at the bottom of your tax forms to pat yourself on the back. Without you the federal and provincial governments would have to close up shop. (Now wait a minute, isn’t that an idea!)

The chart shows the share of total income taxes paid by:

Economic families: Defined as two people or more living together in any of several recognized permutations and combinations, and by unattached individuals.

The table is meant to be self-explanatory but in case it isn’t, and to dwell on these numbers for a moment, what it says is that:

A.      The bottom 20 per cent of families paid just 1.2 per cent of all the income taxes, federal and provincial, that were paid by families.

B.      The next 20 per cent paid more: 5.8 per cent, which means the bottom 40 per cent of families paid just 7.0 per cent of all family-paid income taxes.

C.      By contrast, the top 40 per cent paid 80.5 per cent.

D.      With the top 20 per cent contributing fully 57.5 per cent.

One-fifth of families paying between
a half and two-thirds of taxes.

Way to go, top 20 per cent! Thanks for fording, climbing, etc, and sending in those cheques. (In fact, my family is in there so we thank ourselves, too.) You all deserve the Order of Canada. Maybe under the new rules you’ll get it. Maybe everyone will. Isn’t it bad for people’s self-esteem if some Canadians get the Order and others don’t?

Unattached individuals:

A.      In the same way, the chart says that the bottom 20 per cent of unattached individuals paid less than one per cent of all the income taxes paid by unattached individuals.

B.      The bottom 40 per cent paid only 2.5 per cent.

C.      While the top 40 per cent paid a whopping 88.8 per cent.

D.     Including almost exactly two-thirds of the total paid by the top 20 per cent.

One-fifth of Canadians pay

I say “whopping” but in fact I have no idea whether the allocation of shares pictured in the chart constitutes a morally satisfactory state of affairs, assuming morality and taxation have anything to do with each other. Maybe the bottom 20 per cent are so poorly off they should pay even less income tax than the $900 (for families) and $300 (for individuals) that they averaged. On the other hand, you do sometimes hear it argued that if people aren’t paying taxes, they’re not really invested in the society, so maybe they should have to pay more.

Maybe in the same way the top 20 per cent are so rich that paying only 57.5 or 66.8 per cent of the total isn’t nearly enough.

In our house, I must say, we don’t actually feel that rich, especially after losing a third of our income to income taxes, not to mention similar hits from property, consumption, school board and other taxes.

To help make such moral judgments, it would be useful to have the dollar dividing lines for these income quintiles. They must exist but I can’t find them, not even after an hour of searching StatCan’s website, which has got to be the most user-unfriendly in the Western world, maybe the whole world, though I haven’t tried StatChina’s website. Perhaps the numbers I’m looking for are on the charts where you need a special reader (not Adobe) only downloadable to Windows machines. (Canadian macro data I now get from FRED, the data site at the St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank, which is a treat to use.)

Even without the dollar boundary lines, however, we’ve got one-fifth of Canadians paying one-half to two-thirds of all income taxes. My gut reaction, which I admit is partly determined by my (nearby to my gut) pocketbook reaction, is that that’s enough.


On Income Tax Fairness

by Robert Hughes, Senior Research Fellow

Tuesday, April 28, 2015

Our April Business Conditions Monthly report began the discussion of federal income taxes and equity. It reported IRS data showing that the top 20 percent of income tax filers paid 88 percent of income taxes in 2011.

Of course, the U.S. federal income tax is structured to be progressive, meaning tax rates generally rise as income rises. So, to assess the fairness of the tax system, it is important to know what share of total income the top 20 percent held.

Some will debate whether our tax code is too progressive -- that our rates on upper incomes discourage economic activity -- or not progressive enough. Others will debate whether or not a progressive system is the best one. Advocates of replacing the income tax with a value-added tax are pushing for a less progressive approach (although, some proposals do include some elements of progressivity).

The Congressional Budget Office has produced a very good overview of the current structure of the federal individual income tax using the same 2011 tax return data and it can be read here.

The chart below, from the CBO report, illustrates the concept of progressivity in tax structure. It is a good point of reference as the debate continues over the fairness of our tax structure.

On Income Tax Fairness