Millennials Are Behind: They Earn 20% Less Than Boomers Did At The Same Age

Nos jeunes canadiens sont dans la même situation que les jeunes américains.

Évident un autre sujet tabou dans nos médias mainstream.

·       On va parler du chien enrager dans les médias, mais les jeunes ont s’en fout totalement.

·       Surtout quand on transfert plus de 1,3 trillion de dettes sur le dos.

·       Une bulle immobilière créé artificiellement par nos politiciens, qui mettent la corde au cou au jeune pendant 30 ans pour acheter leurs premières maisons en espérant que la bulle n’éclate pas dans cette période.

·       De compétitionner contre un chinois, un mexicain ou un Bangladesh parce qu’ils sont encore payés trop chers.

·       Pour satisfaire tous les caprices des papys et babys boomers que toutes leurs est dû, mais n’ont pas assez payé leurs dus.

Bravo, en tant que parent d’avoir laissé un lègue aussi lamentable à nos enfants.

Totalement pathétique

Québec Droite

Informations alternatives
sans la pression de groupe d’intérêt.

Extrait de: Why Millennials Are Behind: They Earn 20% Less Than Boomers Did At The Same Age

by Tyler Durden , Jan 14, 2017 6:14 PM

Over the past few years, as the Millennial generation has grown into its own, in 2016 surpassing Baby Boomers as the nation's largest living generation according to the Census (Americans aged 18-34 in 2015 now number 75.4 million, surpassing the 74.9 million Baby Boomers aged 51-69), in the process becoming the fulcrum support of the US economy, it has also prompted many questions:

why aren't Millennials investing in the stock market?

Why aren't they starting families and buying houses?

Why are they living in their parents' basements well into their thirties?

Why don't they just... spend?

The latest answer to all these questions came yesterday following a new analysis of Fed data by the Young Invincibles group, according to which with a median household income of $40,581, despite being better educated, millennials now earn 20% less than boomers did at the same stage of life in 1989, who earned $50,910 some 25 years ago.

The analysis released on Friday shows other disturbing trends, which confirm that America's troubling generational divide is all too real and helps explain much of the anxiety that defined the 2016 election. Some examples: millennials have half the net worth of boomers; their home ownership rate is lower, while their student debt is drastically higher.


The generational gap is a central dilemma for the incoming presidency of Donald Trump, who pledged a return to the prosperity of post-World War II America. The analysis also hints at the issues of culture and identity that divided many voters, showing that white millennials — who still earn much more than their blacks and Latino peers — have seen their incomes plummet the most relative to boomers.

The Fed data shows the extent of the decline. It compared 25 to 34 year-olds in 2013, the most recent year available, to the same age group in 1989 after adjusting for inflation.

Education does help boost incomes.

But the median college-educated millennial with student debt is only earning slightly more than a baby boomer without a degree did in 1989.

The home ownership rate for this age group dipped to 43 percent from 46 percent in 1989, although the rate has improved for millennials with a college degree relative to boomers. The median net worth of millennials is $10,090, 56 percent less than it was for boomers.


While whites still earn dramatically more than Blacks and Latinos, reflecting the legacy of discrimination for jobs, education and housing. Yet compared to white baby boomers, some white millennials appear stuck in a pattern of downward mobility.

This group has seen their median income tumble more than 21% to $47,688. Median income for black millennials has fallen just 1.4 percent to $27,892. Latino millennials earn nearly 29 percent more than their boomer predecessors to $30,436.


The analysis fits into a broader pattern of diminished opportunity. Research last year by economists led by Stanford University's Raj Chetty found that people born in 1950 had a 79 percent chance of making more money than their parents. That figure steadily slipped over the past several decades, such that those born in 1980 had just a 50 percent chance of out-earning their parents.


This decline has occurred even though younger Americans are increasingly college-educated. The proportion of 25 to 29 year-olds with a college degree has risen to 35.6 percent in 2015 from 23.2 percent in 1990, a report this month by the Brookings Institution noted.

The declining fortunes of millennials could impact boomers who are retired
or on the cusp of retirement

·       Payroll taxes from millennials helps to finance the Social Security and Medicare benefits that many boomers receive, programs that Trump has said won't be subject to spending cuts.

·       And those same boomers will need younger generations to buy their homes and invest in the financial markets to protect their own savings.

Évidemment, je vous ai dit que l’économie est complexe, comment voulez -vous qu’on puisse payer les belles retraites dorées à nos fonctionnaires dodus, notre RRQ, ou notre système santé ect …

Quand nos futurs payeurs d’impôts sont de plus en plus pauvres.

Non, on préfère parler du chien enragé.

"The challenges that young adults face today could forecast the challenges that we see down the road," said Tom Allison, deputy policy and research director at Young Invincibles.

For now, despite Obama's recurring narrative of an economic "recovery" which unfortunately skipped some 75.4 million Americans, and despite Trump's promises that he will somehow make it batter, it remains unclear just how this most important US generation will emerge from its demographic and economic doldrums