US travel ban : Ce que nos médias hystériques libérales de gauche oublient de mentionner, tel que le JDM.

Évidemment nos petits médias anti-Trump on fait une petite crise existentielles cette fin de semaine, car les États-Unis impose un interrogatoire plus serré aux passagers provenant de sept pays à haut risque, à ce jour les États-Unis, je crois, est encore un pays souverain!
On a juste à examiner le sallisage anti-trump de nos chroniqueurs d’opinions amateurs du Journal de Montréal.
Pierre Martin : anti-Trump depuis le début, professeur d’université imputable de rien car c’est un fonctionnaire, rien de surprensant :
Certaines mauvaises langues prétendront que la raison pour laquelle aucune sanction n’a été déclarée contre l’Arabie saoudite, l’Égypte, la Turquie, l’Azerbaïdjan et les Émirats arabes unis est que l’Organisation Trump a des investissements ou des projets en cours dans chacun de ces cinq pays alors qu’elle n’en a pas dans les pays sanctionnés. (1)
Pauvre toi, la liste provient de OBAMA !


Fatima Houda-Pepin :
Or, ce sont précisément les multiples interventions de l’Armée américaine en Afrique, en Asie et au Moyen-Orient qui ont dévasté les pays dont vous bannissez aujourd’hui les ressortissants. (3)
Chers Fatima est-ce que vous êtres imbéciles ou quoi !, M. Trump n’est que président que depuis 8 jours. Pensez-vous qu’il peut s’attaquer ouvertement le ‘Deep State’ système industriel militaire américain qui rapporte 1 trillion par année, cela va tout prendre pour tenter de modérer la situation avec la Russie, alors imaginée s’il pousse trop fort, on risque de le retrouver mort dû à un fâcheux incident imprévisible.


Joseph Facal : un anti-Trump inconditionnel, sur un autre sujet pour lui une mondialisation sauvage est justifiable. Un autre professeur grassement payé, il peut dire n’importe quoi, imputable de rien à cause de la sécurité d’emploi, permanence et ancienneté et une foutue belle retraite dorée qui n’a pas payée sur le dos du secteur privé et des futurs enfants non encore nés.
Sur le long terme, l’expansion du commerce mondial a profité à l’immense majorité, inégalement bien sûr, au point que nous tenons ses bienfaits pour acquis et ne voyons plus que ses problèmes.
La compétition commerciale force à s’améliorer, fait baisser les prix et favorise la paix, puisqu’on attaque rarement un partenaire commercial.
Il faut civiliser la mondialisation, pas lui tourner le dos. (2)
Demandez cela, aux 625 emplois de GM perdus la semaine passée, car ils vont être transférés au Mexique, vous être pitoyable et pathétique M. Facal, rien de surprenant venant d’un fonctionnaire, l’art de regarder le peuple du haut, mais qu’il oublie que c’est le peuple qui le paie.


Mario Dumont : Un autre chroniqueur anti-Trump, sur un autre sujet, trop souvent ces chroniques sont mal étoffés, manque de profondeur, texte facile pour faire du bruit.
La stratégie du président Trump face au Partenariat transpacifique me paraît encore plus douteuse. L’un des objectifs des États-Unis et du Canada en négociant le PTP était d’établir une zone de commerce avec l’Australie et des pays asiatiques pour faire un contrepoids à la Chine. En signant le retrait des États-Unis de l’accord plus tôt cette semaine, Trump tue le PTP. (4)
Typique de Dumont, connaît très peu ces dossiers en profondeurs, il écrit du texte pour écrire du texte. Le PTP détruisant la souveraineté des pays, vivre la globalisation à outrance, le PTP a été écrit par les multinationales ou une institution privée pouvaient actionner n’importe quel pays, parce qu’il n’était pas d’accord avec celui-ci.
Je suis tout à fait d’accord avec la position de M. Trump, finis les accords multilatéraux, où cela prend un seul pays pour foutre le bordel, s’il ne joue pas franc-jeu. Seul, les accords, bilatéraux devraient être favorisés et si cela ne fait pas notre affaire, 30 jours d’avis pour sortir de l’accord. 
À part de Michel Girard et Nathalie Elgraby, où les commentaires sont plus posés et plus réfléchis sur le président Trump, les autres, tels que M. Dumont, M. Martineau … n’est que la démagogie de gauche libérale ou tout est beau et aseptisé.
Après, il se demande pourquoi M. Trump est devenu président, sortez de votre tour d’ivoire et peut-être que vous constaterez que le peuple souffre !
Bon revenons, sur notre sujet initial !


Extrait de: Defiant Trump Team Digs In: "We Wont Apologize For Keeping America Safe", by Tyler Durden, ZeroHedge, Jan 29, 2017 4:47 PM
Under assault from foreign governments, domestic CEOs, and thousands of protesters across the nation, members of the Trump administration were stern in their refusal to budge, and were unified in their support of the president's sweeping executive order that bars refugees and people from seven nations from entering the U.S. 
Repeating a phrase first uttered by Trump, top aides to the president denied that the immigration order amounted to a Muslim ban and pointed to the Obama administration for identifying the seven countries included in the order. The Trump team also defended the executive order's at times botched implementation amid backlash from some lawmakers and Federal Judges blocking the partial immgiration order.
Among the more vocal defenders of Trump were top aide Kellyanne Conway, who on Sunday emphasized the importance of having safe borders, suggesting that the small number of people who were inconvenienced by the order was worth it to keep the country safe.
·       She said 325,000 people "from overseas came into this country just yesterday through our airports."
·       "You're talking about 300 and some who have been detained or are prevented from gaining access to an aircraft in their home countries," Conway said on "Fox News Sunday." "Thats 1 percent.
And I think in terms of the upside being greater protection of our borders, of our people, it's a small price to pay." She also echoed Trump and insisted the immigration order was not a Muslim ban, even as some Democratic lawmakers have argued the opposite. 
"These seven countries, what about the 46 majority-Muslim countries that are not included? Right there, it totally undercuts this nonsense that this is a Muslim ban," Conway said.  
"This is a ban on prospective travel from countries, trying to prevent terrorists in this country, from countries that have a recent history of training and exporting and harboring terrorists."
 Returning the attack, Conway said the list of seven countries included in the order actually came from former President Obama's administration, which it did as per a DHS announcement from February 2016.
In February 2016, the Obama administration added Libya, Yemen and Somalia to a list of "countries of concern" with respect to its visa waiver program. Iran, Syria, Iraq and Sudan were already on the list, according to a release from the Department of Homeland Security.
"These are countries that have a history of training, harboring, exporting terrorists," Conway said. She added that the president will "certainly keep identifying threats and risks."
* * *
White House spokesman Sean Spicer also highlight the Obama administration's role for initially flagging the seven "countries of particular concern."  "The Obama administration put these first and foremost," he said on ABC's "This Week."
He similarly noted there are 46 other Muslim-majority countries not included in the seven listed and defended the president for following through on the promises he made during his campaign.
"This is nothing new," Spicer said. "President Trump talked about this throughout the campaign and throughout the transition. The president is just implementing the policies he campaigned on" he added noting that protecting the nation and its people is the No. 1 priority of the Trump administration.
* * *
In a testy exchange with Chuck Todd, White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus was the third to reiterate that the seven countries included in the order were identified by the Obama administration as "the seven most dangerous countries in the world in regard to harboring terrorists and affirmed by Congress multiple times." Priebus also defended the order's implementation, saying there shouldn't have been a "grace period" put on the order.
"Then, people that want to do bad things to Americans would just move up their travel date two days in order to get into the country before the grace period's over," he said on NBC's "Meet the Press."
"I think it's one of these things that, and if you ask a lot of people at the Customs and Border patrol, would just tell you you got to rip off the band-aid and you have to move forward."
As noted earlier, Priebus also clarified the order, saying it doesn't affect green card holders. "We didn't overrule the Department of Homeland Security, as far as green card holders moving forward, it doesn't affect them," Priebus said on NBC's "Meet The Press." But Priebus noted if a person is traveling back and forth to one of the seven countries included in that order, that person is likely to be "subjected temporarily with more questioning until a better program is put in place."
"We don't want people that are traveling back and forth to one of these seven countries that harbor terrorists to be traveling freely back and forth between the United States and those countries," he said.
He clarified that it is up to the "discretionary authority" of a Customs and Border Patrol agent whether people traveling back and forth to these seven countries receive extra questioning. Priebus then added that other countries may need to be added to the executive order in the future.
"But in order to do this in a way that was expeditious, in a way that would pass muster quickly," he said, "we used the 7 countries that have already been codified and identified." He said the order was "done for the protection of Americans, and waiting another three days, waiting another three weeks is something that we don't want to get wrong."
Priebus' bottom line: Trump won't apologize for keeping Americans safe: "President Trump is not willing to get this wrong," Priebus said, "which is why he wants to move forward quickly and protect Americans.... So we apologize for nothing here."